(With thanks to colleague Charles Abelson at Truth be Told -TbT)
Hamas'
actions are in clear violation of the most fundamental principles of the laws
of armed conflict, including the principle of distinction. This principle
requires parties to an armed conflict to refrain from deliberately targeting
civilian population or civilian objects. Likewise, it requires parties to
distinguish its military operations and the civilian population, and to refrain
from using the presence of the civilian population to shield military
objectives.
Hamas
violates this fundamental principle in two main ways –
· By
deliberately attacking Israel's civilian population, including by conducting
suicide, rocket and mortar attacks.
· By
deliberately and systematically employing tactics which put the Palestinian
civilian population in danger, including the launching of attacks from within
densely populated areas, the use of human shields, deploying weapons storage
sites and command centers in residential homes and in densely populated areas
and commandeering sensitive sites (such as hospitals, private homes, schools
and mosques) for terrorist use.
These actions clearly
constitute war crimes, as defined by international law and may also amount to
crimes against humanity.
The principle of distinction
is anchored in customary international law. It has been reflected in treaties
and other sources of international law, including in several articles of the
Additional Protocol to Geneva Conventions, 1979.[1] For
example:
·
Article 48: “In order to ensure respect for and
protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the
conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and
combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly
shall direct their operations only against military objectives.”
· Article
51(2): "The civilian population as such, as well as individual
civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence
the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population
are prohibited"
· Article
58: " The Parties to the conflict shall, to the maximum extent feasible:
(a)…endeavor to remove the civilian population, individual civilians and
civilian objects under their control from the vicinity of military objectives;
(b) Avoid locating military objectives within or near
densely populated areas;"
·
Article 51(7): "…
The Parties to the conflict shall not direct the movement of the civilian
population or individual civilians in order to attempt to shield military
objectives from attacks or to shield military operations."
· Article
12(4): "Under no circumstances shall medical units be used in an
attempt to shield military objectives from attack. Whenever possible, the
Parties to the conflict shall ensure that medical units are so sited that
attacks against military objectives do not imperil their safety."
·
Article 53: "It
is prohibited (a) to commit any acts of hostility directed against the historic
monuments, works of art or places of worship which constitute the
cultural or spiritual heritage of peoples; (b) to use such objects in support of the military
effort;
Palestinian UN representative themselves say every missile fired from Gaza at Israel is ‘a crime against humanity’
In interview with PA TV, diplomat details possible risks to the Palestinians of their joining the International Criminal Court.
The Palestinian
representative to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva said that every rocket
and mortar fired from Gaza toward Israel is a “crime against humanity.”
Speaking on July 9 to
Palestinian Authority TV on the possible risks involved if Palestinians leaders
ask to join the International Criminal Court — as they have threatened to do in
order to push for measures against Israel — Ambassador Ibrahim Kraishi
said the “Palestinian weakness” in terms of international law is the
indiscriminate firing of rockets at Israel.
“The missiles that are now
being launched against Israel, each and every missile constitutes a crime
against humanity, whether it hits or misses, because it is directed at civilian
targets,” said Kraishi.
The ambassador said that,
by contrast, Israel’s actions follow legal procedures, because the IDF warns
Gazan civilians to leave sites and areas before they are bombed.
“Many of our people in
Gaza appeared on TV and said that the Israelis warned them to evacuate their
homes before the bombardment. In such a case, if someone is killed, the law
considers it a mistake rather than an intentional killing because [the
Israelis] followed the legal procedures.”
“As for the missiles
launched from our side, we never warn anyone about where these missiles are
about to fall or about the operations we carry out,” he says.
[1] It should be noted that Israel is not a Party to the Additional
Protocols. Nevertheless, it is Israel's position that a number of Articles in
the Protocol reflect customary international law.
3 comments:
Why is Hamas, its leader and terrorist not tried by the International Court for their war crimes? Why is no action taken on this behalf? Where are the NGOs, so anxious to always condemn Israel, why do they have nothing to say about the crimes of Hamas against Israel? They should be condemned too for their hatred and biased comments. What action should be taken to bring Hamas before International Court for their crimes against humanity and violating all the UN protocols?
Keep up the good work. Your news blog is one of the few reliable sources of genuine fact.
Israel has gone beyond the moral standards of all contemporary conflicts in respecting the 'legal' rules of battle. It should be a 'light unto the nations' which are at war. Instead it is constantly attacked. I can't for the life of me understand why my fellow human beings blind themselves to any positive aspects of the Israeli people in their handling of the Palestinian problem.
SC montreal
The reason to this is that Arabs are pouring for decades tons of money (or maybe wells of money) unto the media, changing history with their lies with no answer from Israel.
Who knows today that for thousands of years until today there was noone
but a Jewish state in Israel (which the romans called Palestine)ets.
Post a Comment