Why is Hamas so confident that it’s winning?

 For full article go to https://www.jns.org/why-is-hamas-so-confident-that-its-winning/ 

Khaled Mashaal, the head of Hamas’s “political wing,” in his luxurious living quarters in Doha, Qatar, thinks the war has gone just fine. He thinks that Hamas is “winning the war” and is confident that the genocidal Islamist organization will, despite the battering it has received from the Israel Defense Forces, play a “decisive” role in Gaza in the future.

It takes an extraordinary amount of chutzpah to sit in a comfortable place of exile where you are protected by Qatar—an ally of Iran and Hamas—while the Gulf State also pretends to be friendly with the United States. It’s odd for a “political” leader to be so blithe about a conflict that has, despite the inflated statistics of civilian casualties in the Gaza Strip produced by Hamas, certainly inflicted tremendous harm on his own people. By hiding from the IDF in a warren of tunnels the size of the New York subway system underneath civilian homes, they set in motion a confrontation that guaranteed that much of the Strip would be destroyed. And Hamas itself has been severely hurt. Reportedly, 20,000 operatives have been killed, and all of its organized military formations are no longer combat-effective. The same is true of its ability to send long-range missiles into Israel.

Survival equals a Hamas victory

By any normal definition of victory or defeat, in the aftermath of its orgy of mass murder, rape, torture, kidnappings and wanton destruction in Israel on Oct. 7, Hamas hasn’t been beaten.

While most of us have understandably focused on the fighting in Gaza as well as the way Hezbollah terrorists have been able to essentially de-populate a portion of northern Israel with its indiscriminate fire on civilians, one of the key fronts in this war is not in the Middle East. It’s in the United States.

Hamas have been doing nothing but playing for time. And they expected that the time they needed to outlast the Israeli offensive would be provided to them by Israel’s closest ally.

Combined with the post-Oct. 7 surge in antisemitism made obvious by the pro-Hamas encampments at elite universities, it gave Hamas every reason not to negotiate seriously for a hostage release deal. Hamas viewed all of this as encouragement for its plan to simply hunker down in its remaining tunnel strongholds, and hold out until U.S. and international pressure—heightened by the anti-Israel bias of the mainstream media—forced Israel to stand down and allow the Islamists to emerge as the victor in the war.

Demoralizing the Israelis

While Israelis have every right to protest against their government even in wartime, Hamas also views the unrest inside the Jewish state as an asset. The families of the remaining hostages and Netanyahu’s political opposition now seek to pressure him to give up the war and sign a ceasefire agreement, even if it means essentially handing Gaza back to Hamas and ensuring a repeat of the horrors of Oct. 7. I understand why some feel that way for a number of different reasons, but the fact remains that Hamas is counting on that sentiment.

But above all, Hamas views American pressure on Israel as its ace in the hole.

The reality of Palestinian politics

If left to carry out its tasks without foreign interference, the IDF will eventually eliminate Hamas, though that task will not be accomplished easily or quickly. It can certainly prevent it from returning to power in Gaza, thus ensuring that its reign of terror over Israel as well as Palestinians is over. The terrorist group are counting on feckless American politicians, ideologically motivated leftist demonstrators and political activists, a media that is always prepared to demonize Israeli efforts at self-defense, as well as war-weariness and anguish about the hostages inside Israel to guarantee their survival. We may hope that they are wrong about that, but it’s easy to understand why the terrorist leader is confident that he can outlast the Israelis … with American help.

UK Openly Finances Hamas & Closes Its Eyes

 NGO Monitor researchers uncovered a UK-funded cash aid program

in Gaza that was distributed “in coordination” with a

Hamas-controlled ministry — a fact British officials

were fully aware of. The revelation has triggered a wave of

media coverage and public debate, raising urgent questions

about aid oversight, accountability, and the risks of indirect support

for designated terrorist organizations.

Breakthrough with Laser Technology

 Amongst many new technologies that have been proven in this war (but not yet officially reported), the laser based system has been very successful.

Israel’s Defense Ministry, in collaboration with the Israel Air Force and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, revealed this week, that laser-based interception systems were successfully used in combat for the first time during the ongoing “Swords of Iron” war.

According to a ministry statement, in a major leap forward for military technology, dozens of enemy threats — primarily drones — were neutralized using high-powered laser technology developed through years of research and recently accelerated innovation.

The laser systems, which represent a revolutionary layer in Israel’s multi-tiered missile defense architecture, were rapidly deployed by the Air Force during the war.

The new systems reportedly achieved high interception rates, preventing potential casualties and damage to key infrastructure.

This achievement marks the first operational use of such high-powered laser technology on the battlefield globally.

The Resilience of Israel’s Economy

 For full article see  https://www.jpost.com/aliyah/assisted-living-facilities/article-855353

To understand the resilience of Israel’s economy, one must look at the objective data that reflects a country’s ability to withstand times of crisis. At the start of the "Iron Swords" war, various economic indicators showed significant declines. However, these downturns lasted only a few months. Soon after, the economy bounced back to full strength—despite the ongoing war, rocket attacks from multiple directions, and the uncertainty weighing on the country's citizens.

How did this happen? Credit usage returned to pre-war levels. The shekel, which had weakened and crossed the four-shekel-per-dollar mark in late 2023, regained its value. The demand for housing, both from Israeli citizens and foreign buyers, steadily increased.

When a Jewish person abroad fears walking the streets wearing a kippah, speaking Hebrew or showing an affiliation to their traditions, the national homeland becomes an almost immediate preferred investment—securing the future. That is precisely what happened in Israel throughout 2024. The number of Jewish buyers purchasing homes in Israel surged significantly, contributing to the economy’s return to normal activity levels.

Furthermore, despite the prolonged war, Israel is expected to see economic growth of 4% over the next two years—matching the pace of leading global economies. Unemployment remains very low, fluctuating between 2.6% and 3.7%, figures that effectively indicate full employment. While the debt-to-GDP ratio initially climbed to 72%, it has since returned to 69%. When compared to countries like the U.S., Italy, the U.K., France, or Austria, Israel’s economic standing is remarkably strong. Macroeconomic data points to highly effective economic management by the Bank of Israel.

When comparing stock market performance, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange outperformed the New York Stock Exchange in 2024.

So, what is the foundation of Israel’s economic strength? First and foremost—its people. Israel’s GDP per capita stands at approximately $58,000, ranking it 13th in the world. The country benefits from capital, cutting-edge technology, but above all, highly talented and deeply committed individuals who invest immense effort in maintaining a strong economy and a high quality of life. 

Agricultural Crime Skyrockets in Southern Israel

 Agricultural crime has skyrocketed in southern Israel since the beginning of the year, with farmers mainly blaming a justice system that does not penalize criminals sufficiently to create proper deterrence, as Ynet reported last week

The culprits are usually Bedouin, whether working alone or in gangs. The thieves steal animals, agricultural machines, farm produce and piping from fields and barns, and break into homes as well.

Cattle and sheep theft alone has risen more than 200% over 2024.

A vast majority of the criminals are not caught, and even when some are, usually very few of the animals are recovered.

This is despite the authorities doing a better job than they used to.

“I don’t have many complaints about the police,” said Eran Guy, deputy security coordinator of a moshav in the western Negev. “A decade ago, people would steal, I would call 100 and they would come after two or three days. There has been a change…. They try very hard. But [the area] is full of crime.”

There is also a very active drug and weapons smuggling route nearby, he noted, as well as openly growing marijuana fields.

“In the southern district, from Ashdod to Eilat, which controls 60% of the agricultural land in the country, most of the fields are in isolated places… If there is an isolated wheat field and there are no cameras in the area, my chances of catching a thief are zero,” said Superintendent Amos Damari, commander of the Southern Border Police Division.

Ambushes based on intelligence and knowledge of the various growing seasons is the most successful tactic the police use, he explained.

The problem of attaining justice is two-fold. Indictments in general, said the report, will only be filed for relatively large thefts, and the sentences meted out are too light.

Active prison time ranging from several months to five years are unremarkable, and fines are rarely high.

Those who are underage get off even easier. Bedouin minors are living lives of crime and do not fear getting caught “because the law is with them and they have good lawyers,” said Guy. “This attitude will not stop the thieves”.

“If they would catch a sheep rustler and put him in jail for 15 years, and put the next guy in for 15 years, they’d understand that there’s no such thing as making easy money,” he said.

Farmers have become fearful for their personal safety as well as their financial wellbeing.

“First of all, there is the damage to your sense of personal security,” D., a veteran dairy farmer, said. “My farm is my home. And someone broke into your house while you were at home. He took what was yours. It makes you sleepless for many nights to come.”

“It’s a blow on an economic and personal level,” he added. “The members are suffering, they are not sleeping at night, and there is a fear of letting the children roam freely in the moshav.”

The Media Painted Israel’s Eurovision Entry as ‘Divisive.’ Viewers Made Her a Star.

 (With thanks to Honest Reporting, For the full report see https://honestreporting.com/the-media-painted-israels-eurovision-entry-as-divisive-viewers-made-her-a-star/: ) 5 minutes

Reading the media’s Eurovision coverage ahead of Saturday night’s live final, you could be forgiven for thinking Europe was on the brink of revolt — not over the music, but because Israel was allowed to compete.

The contest was held in Basel, Switzerland but instead of coverage on costumes, staging, or song predictions, much of the press zeroed in on Israel.

Take the Associated Press, which on May 16 published a piece headlined: “Israel’s presence still roils Eurovision a year after major protests over the war in Gaza.” The article detailed a protest in Basel the night before the final — involving 200 people, “many draped in Palestinian flags,” demanding Israel’s expulsion from the competition. That’s 200 people. In a city hosting an event watched by 160 million.

NBC News took an even more dramatic tone with its headline: “United by music, divided on Israel: Eurovision tensions bubble up in famously neutral Switzerland.” Readers were told that protests over Israel’s participation had reached a “fever pitch,” and that “Basel, and Europe at large, are anything but united.” A fever pitch? An entire continent divided? Over 200 people with flags — and little more than death threats for a 24-year-old woman?

AFP joined the chorus with a headline on May 11: “Parade, protests kick off Eurovision Song Contest week.” But even that article opened with a contradictory statement: “The Swiss city is hosting the 69th edition of the world’s biggest annual live televised music event, reaching around 160 million viewers.”

In other words: massive global interest. And yet, we’re meant to believe the event was overshadowed by a protest that could barely fill a city square.

CNN, meanwhile, once again demonstrated its disconnect from public sentiment with a piece titled “The good, the bad and the raunchy: All 26 Eurovision songs, ranked from worst to first.” The article placed Yuval Raphael’s “New Day Will Rise” at a dismissive 20th out of 26, describing it as the second consecutive Israeli entry to “make implicit reference to Hamas’ attacks,” but adding that “on a musical level, it’s the weaker of the pair.”

Israel Triumphs in Public Vote

So after all the noise, what happened?

Israel came first in the audience vote. In other words: if the public alone had decided, Israel would have won.

Israel earned the maximum 12 points in the public vote from the United Kingdom, Spain, Sweden, Australia, and Portugal — all of whose juries gave her zero. In Ireland, where the broadcaster led the charge to discuss Israel’s participation, the public gave Israel 10 points, and the jury gave 7.

For all the media’s insistence that Israel’s presence was unwelcome, millions of ordinary viewers voted otherwise.

Let’s be honest: much of the media wasn’t reporting on Eurovision — it was campaigning within it. The press wanted to make Israel’s participation look controversial. They wanted Raphael to lose. That, for them, would have been the ultimate verdict: a musical referendum on Israel.

But they failed. The audience saw through it. The public voted. And Israel’s Yuval Raphael sang — and soared.

 

USA Falling for Iran's Tricks Again

• Iran appears to be using diplomacy to stall, deceive and advance its nuclear capabilities behind closed doors, while securing financial and geopolitical concessions from the West.
• The disturbing part is not that Iran's mullahs are following their usual tactics. The horror is that American officials and Western leaders appear to be falling for this shell-game all over again.
• The problem with enriching hostile regimes to "buy quiet" is that this is the money they use to build nuclear weapons with which to attack us.
• An additional problem, unfortunately, is that the Iranian regime has a well-documented history of lying.
• No deal that permits any level of enrichment or allows Iran to keep its centrifuges intact will prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons.
• We are trying to "deal" with theocrats who believe it is their divine duty to destroy Israel and America, and take over the oil-rich states in the Persian Gulf.
• What makes the current situation even more exasperating is that despite decades of talks, deals and diplomatic theater with North Korea, Russia, China and Iran, we have watched them exploit Western weakness and lack of resolve time and again right under our noses. Yet, like Charlie Brown and the football, the West insists on accepting the same failed, bogus guarantees. We do not need another Swiss-cheese agreement filled with loopholes. We do not need photo-ops and press conferences proclaiming bogus triumphs.

(Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, born in Iran, a political scientist, human rights defender, and journalist, is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. Harvard-educated. )

For full article read at https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21627/iran-using-north-korea-playbook 

The Oslo Accords Experiment is Dead

So many Israelis, particularly on the left of the political map (but not only) have considered for years that the aim of the Palestinian movement was one of nationalistic aims. In other words, the establishment of a Palestinian state. Thus, much of the thinking imposed similarities between the Zionistic aims and the Palestinian aims.

 
This was a total misunderstanding of Palestinian intentions and their fundamentalist ideology was not taken seriously. Israelis were not listening to the messages being broadcast to Palestinians themselves. How often were the “peaceful” messages of Arafat given to lull the West, but his messages to the Palestinians were, in fact, one of the hope of destroying Israel, as clearly set out in the charters of both Hamas (article 32) and the Palestinian Authority (articles 2 and 25).
 
There is a need to move away from the Oslo Accords ideology which was based on the thoughts that by giving the Palestinians work in Israel, this would give them the opportunity for a brighter future. We now know that many of those working in Israel were part of an extensive intelligence network created by Hamas which provided all the information they needed for maximizing the potential of the October 7^th heinous invasion.
 
At all levels in the IDF, the security and intelligence establishment and the police, the Oslo Accords syndrome is still alive and well. However, it is clear no Palestinian leader has ever aspired to building a nation state unless it was by the elimination of the State of Israel.
 
It is now necessary to rebuild the leadership in the IDF, security, intelligence and police forces to acknowledge what should have been acknowledged years ago, the Oslo Accords was a failed experiment.

The West in Trouble - Does it Realise it?

 The Middle East conflict is a small part of a world wide cultural war.

When will the West wake up to this?

The Yellow Parking Lot

 (With thanks to my friend Forest Rain Marcia)

A yellow parking place, in a bustling parking lot, symbolically set aside for the hostages—until they all come home.

I don’t think people abroad comprehend how all-consuming is the fact that there are hostages. In every moment, every breath, they are with us.

The liberated hostages have told us about the starvation, torture, and abuse. The lack of air and sun. We saw the physical effects on them when they returned. Some of the effects.

I don’t think people abroad understand that the hostages are a symbol of the horror and abuse we have suffered—and are still suffering—from the Gazan invasion. They are not the totality of our suffering. And rescuing them is not enough.

Even many Israelis don’t fully comprehend that.

We cannot wrap our minds, our hearts, around the monstrous crimes that defiled our loved ones and destroyed the sanctity of our homes. Homes destroyed. Families ripped apart. Soldiers killed and wounded. Sons (and some daughters) crippled for life. Fathers who will never come home. Countless people who saw soul-shattering things...

And the people around the world who deny, justify, and celebrate October 7th.

It is easier not to see the entirety of our pain. To deflect blame. To pretend that the return of the hostages would be enough.

That it is possible to compromise with those who promised to exterminate us.
That Israelis can return to their homes, when their neighbors are the monsters who slaughtered their families.

That it is possible to live with neighbors who we have taught can get anything they want—if they take Jews hostage—and what they want is to destroy the Jewish State.

That there is any solution but removing the threat.

Winning Battles, Losing Minds

 By IRWIN J. (YITZCHAK) MANSDORF . Full Article at https://tinyurl.com/5bzzxxme

One of the most basic insights in behavioral psychology is that people are wired to respond to immediate rewards even if those carry long-term consequences. Whether it’s eating another slice of cake, smoking a harmful cigarette, or running a red light, we tend to act when the benefit is now and the price is later. If the reward feels good enough and the threat seems distant enough, we take the risk.

This is not just human nature. It’s a weapon; one that Hamas has used masterfully in its psychological war against Israel and the West over the past 18 months.

With the help of Iranian and Qatari backers, Hamas has turned hostage diplomacy into a psychological trap. The emotional appeal of bringing hostages home – a deeply human desire – has become the bait. The cost? A stronger, bolder, more dangerous Hamas, just as ideologically committed to Israel’s destruction as ever.

And the trap is working.

Every potential deal with Hamas carries a price. And the terror organization ensures that the price is steep. Within Israel, a moral rift is deepening. For some, particularly hostage families, nothing matters more than bringing loved ones home. For others, the memory of October 7 and the desire to ensure it never happens again means defeating Hamas, even at terrible cost.

This is the heart of our moral dilemma: Two values – both legitimate – that feel increasingly irreconcilable.

Hamas is exploiting this divide with precision. One day, it offers a temporary hudna (“ceasefire”). The next, it releases a hostage video. All the while, it plays the victim: children under rubble, hospitals without power, shelters destroyed. The images are tragic – but they also serve a purpose. The responsibility, they suggest, lies not with Hamas, but with Israel.

Incredibly, many Israelis, who despise Hamas and all it stands for, fall into this psychological trap. Instead of demanding that Hamas release the hostages unconditionally, as international law requires, public anger often turns inward, toward the Israeli government. It is a striking success of Hamas’s psychologically asymmetric strategy.

The same is true in the West. There, the dominant narrative is one of Israeli oppression and “genocide” in Gaza. This narrative is a result of years of emotional manipulation and moral confusion.

Headlines show starving children and suffering patients, rarely acknowledging Hamas’s role in initiating the conflict or continuing to hold innocent Israelis captive. The moral burden shifts to Israel, while the terrorists evade accountability.

What does this all mean? First, we must take a more sober view of the reality we’re in. The moral imperative to rescue living hostages is real – but so is the government’s duty to protect its citizens from future atrocities. 

These are not easy choices. But they are not mutually exclusive either. We must stop demonizing decisions we disagree with and start appreciating the weight of the dilemma.

Second, we must recognize that Hamas is watching us, learning about us, and playing us. 

Militarily, we may be stronger. But on the psychological battlefield, Hamas currently holds the emotional upper hand. That’s how it continues to manipulate public opinion, both in Israel and in the West.

New Humanitarian Aid Plan for Gaza

 Israel is preparing to implement a new humanitarian aid distribution system in southern Gaza designed to prevent Hamas from seizing the supplies, according to a report on Tuesday.

The plan, revealed by military correspondent Doron Kadosh on Army Radio’s “Boker Tov Israel” program, will focus on the Rafah area between the Morag and Philadelphi corridors—territory currently under Israeli military control. Civilians will only be permitted access to aid after undergoing strict screening procedures.

Three designated distribution centers will be established in Rafah, which will serve as the central hub for aid to the entire Gaza Strip. Each Gazan family will be represented by a single, registered individual authorized to collect a weekly food allotment, calibrated to meet survival needs—approximately 70 kilograms per household—without creating surpluses that could be exploited by terrorist groups.

Distribution will be managed via a formal registration process overseen by vetted NGOs and American private contractors. A senior Israeli security official emphasized that the new system aims to eliminate Hamas’s ability to intercept or steal bulk shipments.

“Hamas will find it much harder to seize aid from Gazan families,” the official said. “It’s one thing to hijack a supply truck. It’s another to rob food directly from the hands of hungry civilians.”

The new mechanism comes amid heightened pressure from the United States and international community over humanitarian conditions in Gaza. On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump acknowledged that “people are starving” in the Strip and pledged U.S. assistance, while sharply criticizing Hamas for seizing aid deliveries and “making it impossible” to help civilians in need.

Israeli officials believe the plan strikes the right balance—addressing civilian needs while denying Hamas the ability to weaponize humanitarian relief, according to the report.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar said Tuesday that he had briefed European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on the situation in Gaza, including the delivery of humanitarian aid to the coastal enclave.

“Hamas used the humanitarian aid that entered Gaza to feed its war machine,” Sa’ar wrote on X, warning that the war against the terrorist group would “continue forever” if such conditions persist.

“Therefore, Israel must change the way it facilitates the entrance of goods,” he added. “The international community—and any country interested in ensuring that aid reaches civilians rather than Hamas—must support Israel’s efforts, not obstruct them.”

From protest to duty: How Gaza war Recast the Israeli Reservist Ethos

 As Israel expands its Gaza campaign, reservists who once questioned the system now report for duty.

For the full report click here.  

Less than two years ago, some Israeli reservists threatened to put down their rifles. They marched in Tel Aviv, signed letters of protest, and warned that serving under a government dismantling the country’s democratic foundations would be a betrayal of their values.

Today, many of those same reservists are packing bags and crossing back into Gaza.

“I’ve been called up three times already,” says Liel Friedmann, a 38-year-old infantry reservist from Tel Aviv. “People ask, ‘Why are you going again?’ But this isn’t a social club. There’s no one else. That’s the truth.”

Friedmann, who spoke  just hours before deployment, reflects a broader transformation among segments of Israeli society once aligned with protest. His voice—anxious but resolved—embodies the fatigue of war and the burden of necessity.

“I try not to think too much about civilian life when I’m called,” he says. “The second round, a few months ago, felt pointless. It was like we were just stretching the war out. But now it feels more focused, like there’s a goal.”

That goal—at least in the eyes of Israel’s military establishment and right-leaning security circles—is the complete dismantling of Hamas and the return of 59 hostages still believed to be held in Gaza. To achieve that, the government is now calling up tens of thousands of reservists in what may be the most extensive reserve mobilization since October.

According to Lt. Col. (res.) Yaron Buskila, secretary-general of the Israel Defense and Security Forum, this call-up is not a matter of policy—it’s a matter of survival.

“This is not a choice. It’s a necessity,”  “There is no way to defeat Hamas or to bring the hostages home without reserve forces. Negotiations could drag on for years—and that would only endanger the hostages further.”

As tens of thousands of Israelis report for duty once again, the picture is complex. Loyalty to the country does not mean loyalty to its leaders. For some, the uniform is a burden. For others, it’s a line of defense—for their families, for democracy, and for the right to keep fighting for both.

 

The IDF Current Goals

 

Brigadier General (Res.) Amir Avivi says the IDF must put pressure on the terror organization to release the hostages

The IDF is consistently pursuing three main goals, according to Brigadier General (Res.) Amir Avivi of IDSF, the Israel Defense and Security Forum

He told a local News channel  that :-

the first goal is improving the defense of the towns along the Gaza Strip.

“We have to bring back people to the kibbutzim that are really close to the border,” he said. “In order to do that, we need to push Hamas west toward the sea and secure the area.”

The second goal is to put pressure on the terror organization to release the hostages

“It’s crystal clear that Hamas is not pressured enough. They need to be pressured more in order to bring them to the point where they are willing to do a hostage deal—without Israel needing to give up its goals of war, without giving up the mission of eradicating Hamas,” Avivi said.

Finally, the third goal is to destroy Hamas’s rule in Gaza. To that end, the government  have announced that more troops are being called to battle.

 

Israel is an Apartheid State?

(With thanks to Ben Herskowitz)