Stealth Jihad of the West. Is Anyone Paying Attention ?

  

§  Stealth jihad is well advanced in the U.S., with the entire American left enabling and aiding the expansion of Muslim political power, without realizing or caring that they are supporting a radically intolerant and supremacist ideology.

§  We see in particular [in Europe] the increase of churches being bought and transformed into mosques. Muslims in general prefer this to building new buildings: the transformation of a church into a mosque is for them a visible manifestation of Islam's victory, superiority over Christianity, and coming hegemony.

§  Hundreds of years of jihad attacks weakened and ultimately destroyed the Roman Empire in Constantinople. The failure to get help from the West... played a large role in Constantinople's ultimate fall, as well as disunity among the leaders of the empire itself. Some were even short-sighted and self-serving enough to seek and obtain help from Muslim forces.

§  The U.S. faces a similar threat from short-sighted and self-serving leaders of our own. The Democrats are busy encouraging the growth of Muslim political power, while insisting on ignoring the political, supremacist, expansionist and violent aspects of Sharia. Few politicians are aware of the nature and magnitude of the threat, or are resolved to do anything about it. If this continues, we will eventually face our own May 29, 1453 -- the fall of Constantinople ....

§  [P]robably all religions are affected, even though there are some notable individuals who have not been afraid to speak out -- or prevented from doing so.

Robert Bruce Spencer is a Christian American scholar writing on topics including Islam, Orthodoxy, and the Byzantine Empire. The director of Jihad Watch, he is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He has led seminars on Islam and jihad for organizations like the FBI, the United States Central Command, and the U.S. intelligence community.

NAZA - The Real Story

The IDF have issued a documentary NAZA The Real Story https://nazadocumentary.com/  countering all the misinformation in the Guardian's film which is full of lies, misinformation and distortions

How did the film NAZA even got into the festival competition.  The lineup was declared final on July 23; NAZA’s entry only materialized on August 24.  A film that enters a month after the list was locked has not been selected normally.  It has been inserted, without even a Clinton-esque explanation that it depends what the meaning of “final” is.

Was it orchestrated?  Does it matter?  Everyone in that artsy audience understood what was happening, which is why the claps and cheers went on strong long after they could plausibly mean anything about artistic merit of any film.  They were clapping to make a point: to one another, to the cameras, to the media, and to us, as together they reveled in their genteel contempt for Israel.

In The Guardian’s anti-Zionist kangaroo court, both in their news content and their recent foray into filmmaking, Zionists are seen as their misfortune. Thus, the anti-Israel verdict is predetermined, and exculpatory evidence is never allowed to be presented.

Media Reporting Judea and Samaria

 What Actually Happened

The IDF responded to an arson and attempted stabbing attack at Hanania's farm near Geva Binyamin in Samaria. 

A Palestinian terrorist set fire to one of the farm vehicles and then threatened residents with a knife. The residents responded by driving another vehicle into the terrorist, removing the threat. No stabbing injuries were reported from the incident.

What Actually was Reported in the Media

The settlers drove a vehicle into a Palestinian, eliminating him.

Summary,

No context, just fitting the story to a pre conceived agenda

How Anti Israel Propaganda Works

 

Four lies that world leaders tell you about Israel - and the truth

 

a)     Emmanuel Macron: “Hamas has never operated in the West Bank.”

The Truth:

Hamas has operated in the West Bank since the 1980s and carried out hundreds of terrorist attacks from there, killing hundreds of civilians. Just this week, a Hamas terrorist killed Netanel Shukrun, a 30-year-old father.

b)     Zohran Mammdani: “I can’t support Israel’s existence because it’s a Jewish state that privileges one religion.”

The Truth:

Around 83 countries in the world officially have a state religion or give special privileges to a religion. The only one that Mamdani explicitly said shouldn’t exist is the one Jewish state, which also gives equal rights to all its non-Jewish citizens.

c)     Recep Tayyip Erdogan: “Israel's Hands are Stained with the Blood of 75,000 innocents in Gaza.”

The Truth:

Around 35, 000 of those killed in Gaza are combatants and not innocent civilians — a ratio of 1.2:1. A level never achieved in any other war. In comparison, the U.S. ratio in the war against ISIS was around 3:1. Even in total numbers, it is not the deadliest conflict in recent years, with Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen killing over 400,000 people.

d)     António Guterres “There has been no general commitment by UNRWA to provide any kind of support to Hamas.”

The Truth:

Even the UN has admitted that some UNRWA workers also worked as Hamas operatives and even took part in the October 7th massacre. Around 10% of UNRWA workers are estimated to have had ties with terror organizations. Hamas also used UNRWA facilities for electricity, shelter, and military bases.

 

Guardian Sponsored Film Full of Blood Libels

 Watch how the movie "Naza" manufactured a case against the world’s most moral army.

The End of Reliable Journalism

 The directors of the film  "Naza" did not have to work too hard to discover the real truth, says Sarit Zehavi, a reserve officer in the IDF and head of the Alma Center. 'They could have simply interviewed me. I was one of the founders of the field within the IDF that deals with warning populations on the other side of enemy lines and preserving the lives of their civilians.'*

The filmmakers preferred to tell a story from a very narrow angle, to interview anonymous sources whose level of involvement, rank, and understanding of the process is unclear, and to completely ignore the experts who built these systems with one goal: preserving human life,' Zehavi says. 'There are such experts. I was one of them.'*

"Naza" (which Israelis haven't yet seen) raises serious, urgent questions about the actions of the Israeli army. Financed by The Guardian ( a well known advocate of anti Semitism and distorter of facts) and presented as a documentary, it also raises serious, urgent questions about the practice of journalism.

A little less than 20 years ago, says Sarit, I was one of the founders of the field within the IDF that deals with warning populations on the other side of enemy lines and preserving the lives of their civilians.

We built the work processes that define how to call upon the population to evacuate, and how to track that evacuation. I was personally involved in formulating the target approval processes and operational discussions.

If they had spoken with me, I would have explained to them that the chart shown at the beginning of the film is not a chart for conducting killings, but rather a planning chart for a target identified as being used by Hamas.

Its purpose is to determine whether to strike a target at all, who in the command echelon is authorized to approve it, with what munitions, and under what conditions.

 In stark contrast to what is stated in the film, when the words "Naza 500 – collateral damage estimated at 500" appear in the approval process, the meaning is that action must be taken to reduce the collateral damage.

The filmmakers preferred to tell a story from a very narrow angle, to interview anonymous sources whose level of involvement, rank, and understanding of the process is unclear, and to completely ignore the experts who built these systems with one goal: preserving human life.

This film was produced by two Israelis who are so far to the radical left of the political spectrum that even the leftist parties in the upcoming elections have not associated themselves with them.