ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda announced she was launching an investigation against Israel for alleged crimes committed in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The
Hague is supposed to be a court working according to international law. So how
does it have the authority to launch a war crimes investigation against the
Jewish state.
The government decided to adopt the
recommendations of the inter-ministerial team led by the NSC which recommended
not cooperating with the international court but also not leaving the
prosecutor’s letter unanswered and responding and making it clear that the
court is acting without authority.
In the response letter sent to the ICC, it will also be pointed out that Israel “absolutely rejects the claim that it has carried out war crimes.”
“Israel reiterates its unequivocal position
according to which the court in The Hague lacks the authority according to its own laws to open an
investigation against it,” the letter will note.
This position was also made clear to the court
by other countries and noted experts in international law.
“The unacceptable interference of the court lacks any legal basis and contravenes the goals for which it was established. The State of Israel is committed to the rule of law and will continue to investigate any accusation against it regardless of the source and expects that the court will refrain from violating its sovereign authority,” the statement said. "there is no other word to describe this other than hypocrisy.”
“A body that was founded to defend human rights
has become a hostile body that defends those who trample human rights,” he
added.
The Attorney General restated his position that
the ICC lacks any jurisdiction on this matter since no sovereign Palestinian
state exists nor does any territory belonging to such an entity.
Israel has not joined the ICC.
Anne Herzberg, Legal Advisor at NGO Monitor, who
authored the organizations; amicus brief to the ICC, and has been involved in
the ICC’s Israel-related dealings as far back as the initial efforts in 2008,
stated that Bensouda’s decision was “expected,” and her claim that she and her
office have consistently engaged in a “principled, non-partisan approach” is
“utterly laughable.”
“From the very beginning of her tenure she
encouraged the Palestinians to join the Court, has repeatedly relied upon
claims from and engaged with Palestinian terror-linked NGOs, and invented out
of whole cloth an attenuated legal theory to go after Israelis. And there are
many other indications of bias,” she charged.
“It is unclear if the
new Prosecutor will be able to undo the considerable damage she has done to the
institution’s credibility,” she noted.
No comments:
Post a Comment