Amnesty's
report on this
summer's conflict between Israel and the Hamas terror group accuses Israel
of wrongdoing while producing no evidence. It is a report which could easily be interpreted as a plagiarized Hamas report
The report ignores
documented war
crimes perpetrated by Hamas, including the use of human shields,
as well as ammunition storage and firing at Israeli civilian population centers
from within schools, hospitals, mosques and civilian neighborhoods in Gaza.
The report does not mention the word terror in relation to Hamas or other armed
Palestinian groups, nor mentions tunnels built by
Hamas to infiltrate Israel and perpetrate terror attacks. By ignoring the
nature of the enemy Israel faced in Gaza - a terror group recognized as such by
the European Union, the United States and others - Amnesty's report fails to
contribute to the important discussion needed to solve the conflict. Instead,
Amnesty serves as a propaganda tool for Hamas and other terror groups.
In Israel, investigations
are currently underway by several bodies, inside and outside the Israel
Defense Forces, into over 90 incidents. Two criminal investigations are
underway. These measures are dismissed by Amnesty as insufficient yet in
comparison to Israel's rigorous procedures Amnesty's own methodology raises
questions: The report was not written by Amnesty staff but by local contractors
not mentioned by name and referred to only as "field workers". Their own
credibility in producing the testimonies detailed in the report is never
questioned; independent verification of their claims apparently not deemed
necessary.
The extreme bias of the report is best displayed in its recommendations: Hamas
is not mentioned, as if the group has no responsibility for the bloodshed;
meanwhile, the report dismisses Israel's security challenges. Amnesty should
understand that producing a narrow, decontextualized report restricts its
capability to advance positive change.
1 comment:
Agreed. Amnesty International comes out yet again as an NGO with a clear political platform. We shouldn't expect any objectivity from them.
Post a Comment