A
letter written below by a non - Jewish Scottish professor to his students who voted
to boycott Israel.
It's a response from Dr. Denis MacEoin, a non-Jewish professor, to the motion
put forward by The Edinburgh Student's Association to boycott all things
Israeli, in which they claim Israel is under an apartheid regime. Denis
is an expert in Middle Eastern affairs and was a senior editor of the Middle
East Quarterly. Here's his letter to the students:
TO: The Committee Edinburgh University Student Association.
May I be permitted to say a few words to members of the EUSA? I am an
Edinburgh graduate (MA 1975) who studied Persian, Arabic and Islamic History in
Buccleuch Place under William Montgomery Watt and Laurence Elwell Sutton, two
of Britain 's great Middle East experts in their day. I later went on to
do a PhD at Cambridge and to teach Arabic and Islamic Studies at Newcastle
University . Naturally, I am the author of several books and hundreds of
articles in this field. I say all that to show that I am well informed in
Middle Eastern affairs and that, for that reason, I am shocked and disheartened
by the EUSA motion and vote.
I am shocked for a simple reason: there is not and has never been a system of
apartheid in Israel . That is not my opinion, that is fact that can be
tested against reality by any Edinburgh student, should he or she choose to
visit Israel to see for themselves. Let me spell this out, since I have
the impression that those members of EUSA who voted for this motion are
absolutely clueless in matters concerning Israel, and that they are, in all
likelihood, the victims of extremely biased propaganda coming from the
anti-Israel lobby.
Being anti-Israel is not in itself objectionable. But I'm not talking
about ordinary criticism of Israel. I'm speaking of a hatred that permits
itself no boundaries in the lies and myths it pours out. Thus, Israel is
repeatedly referred to as a "Nazi" state. In what sense is this
true, even as a metaphor? Where are the Israeli concentration camps?
The einzatsgruppen? The SS? The Nuremberg Laws? The Final
Solution? None of these things nor anything remotely resembling them
exists in Israel, precisely because the Jews, more than anyone on earth,
understand what Nazism stood for.
It is claimed that there has been an Israeli Holocaust in Gaza (or
elsewhere). Where? When? No honest historian would treat that
claim with anything but the contempt it deserves. But calling Jews Nazis
and saying they have committed a Holocaust is as basic a way to subvert
historical fact as anything I can think of.
Likewise apartheid. For apartheid to exist, there would have to be a
situation that closely resembled how things were in South Africa under the
apartheid regime. Unfortunately for those who believe this, a weekend in
any part of Israel would be enough to show how ridiculous the claim is.
That a body of university students actually fell for this and voted on it is a
sad comment on the state of modern education. The most obvious focus for
apartheid would be the country's 20% Arab population. Under Israeli law,
Arab Israelis have exactly the same rights as Jews or anyone else; Muslims have
the same rights as Jews or Christians; Baha'is, severely persecuted in Iran,
flourish in Israel, where they have their world center; Ahmadi Muslims,
severely persecuted in Pakistan and elsewhere, are kept safe by Israel; the
holy places of all religions are protected under a specific Israeli law.
Arabs form 20% of the university population (an exact echo of their percentage
in the general population).
In Iran, the Bahai's (the largest religious minority) are forbidden to study in
any university or to run their own universities: why aren't your members
boycotting Iran? Arabs in Israel can go anywhere they want, unlike blacks
in apartheid South Africa. They use public transport, they eat in
restaurants, they go to swimming pools, they use libraries, they go to cinemas
alongside Jews - something no blacks were able to do inSouth Africa.
Israeli hospitals not only treat Jews and Arabs, they also treat Palestinians
from Gaza or the West Bank. On the same wards, in the same operating
theatres.
In Israel , women have the same rights as men: there is no gender
apartheid. Gay men and women face no restrictions, and Palestinian gays
often escape into Israel, knowing they may be killed at home.
It seems bizarre to me that LGBT groups call for a boycott of Israel and say
nothing about countries like Iran, where gay men are hanged or stoned to
death. That illustrates a mindset that beggars belief.
Intelligent students thinking it's better to be silent about regimes that kill
gay people, but good to condemn the only country in the Middle East that
rescues and protects gay people. Is that supposed to be a sick joke?
University is supposed to be about learning to use your brain, to think
rationally, to examine evidence, to reach conclusions based on solid evidence,
to compare sources, to weigh up one view against one or more others. If
the best Edinburgh can now produce are students who have no idea how to do any
of these things, then the future is bleak.
I do not object to well-documented criticism of Israel. I do object when
supposedly intelligent people single the Jewish state out above states that are
horrific in their treatment of their populations. We are going through
the biggest upheaval in the Middle East since the 7th and 8th centuries, and
it's clear that Arabs and Iranians are rebelling against terrifying regimes
that fight back by killing their own citizens.
Israeli citizens, Jews and Arabs alike, do not rebel (though they are free to
protest). Yet Edinburgh students mount no demonstrations and call for no
boycotts against Libya, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Iran. They
prefer to make false accusations against one of the world's freest countries,
the only country in the Middle East that has taken in Darfur refugees, the only
country in the Middle East that gives refuge to gay men and women, the only
country in the Middle East that protects the Bahai's... Need I go on?
The imbalance is perceptible, and it sheds no credit on anyone who voted for
this boycott. I ask you to show some common sense. Get information
from the Israeli embassy. Ask for some speakers. Listen to more
than one side. Do not make your minds up until you have given a fair
hearing to both parties. You have a duty to your students, and that is to
protect them from one-sided argument.
They are not at university to be propagandized. And they are certainly
not there to be tricked into anti-Semitism by punishing one country among all
the countries of the world, which happens to be the only Jewish state. If
there had been a single Jewish state in the 1930's (which, sadly, there was
not), don't you think Adolf Hitler would have decided to boycott it?
Your generation has a duty to ensure that the perennial racism of anti-Semitism
never sets down roots among you. Today, however, there are clear signs
that it has done so and is putting down more. You have a chance to avert
a very great evil, simply by using reason and a sense of fair play.
Please tell me that this makes sense. I have given you some of the
evidence. It's up to you to find out more.
Yours sincerely,
Denis MacEoin
1 comment:
What a truly admirable man to bother go to write such an informative letter in order to educate these ignorant students to the truth about Israel. I shall add him to my list of heroes.
Post a Comment