Pushing both
sides into a forced settlement will lead to disaster, and a Hamas takeover in
the West Bank;
|
The
formula is a familiar one: The more right-wing the government of Israel appears
to the world, the easier it is for the anti-Israel campaigners to do their
work. An increase in Israel in statements and incidents of an anti-Arab nature
leads to a fall-off in support for Israel among Jewish students on US campuses,
and the more organizations like Breaking the Silence and B'Tselem create the
distorted impression that Israel is committing crimes on an ongoing basis, the
easier it is for the BDS activists to tout their case.
The
starting positions are problematic – not only due to the composition of the new
Israeli government, but primarily in light of the geopolitical situation. The
absurd thing is that under current circumstances, Israel's control over the
territories is the lesser evil.
A hasty
political settlement – to which the US administration and EU are leading, with
the encouragement of a bunch of Israelis who support the Palestinian demand for
unilateral recognition of statehood – would be a disaster for the Palestinians.
A Hamas takeover would only be a matter of time.
This
has nothing at all to do with the composition of the government. Isaac Herzog
would encounter the same geopolitical situation; and Tzipi Livni, too, would
encounter Palestinian opposition to any peace deal. After all, the Ehud Barak
and Ehud Olmert governments made very generous offers to Yasser Arafat and
Mahmoud Abbas respectively – to no avail.
Nevertheless,
all is not lost. Assuming that Israeli control over the West Bank is not going
to end anytime soon, a right-wing government can still promote a series of
measures that would better the lives of the Palestinians but would not
undermine Israeli security in the slightest – in the field of water
infrastructure, for example. Funds have been donated for rehabilitation
projects; a start can be made.
And the
same goes for projects in the fields of health, construction and
infrastructure. Israel hasn't been the one to delay development. On the
contrary, since the beginning of Israel's control over the West Bank and Gaza,
there have been huge improvements in most areas.
In
1967, for example, just four Palestinian communities were hooked up to running
water for domestic use; by 2004, however, 643 of the 708 communities were on the
water grid. But there is still much to improve. It's not only a Palestinian
interest, but an Israeli interest too.
There's
something foolish about the fact that the international community is pushing
the sides into a political settlement that will only make things worse for the
Palestinians. But there are some things that can be done even without a peace
agreement. Whether or not improving the situation is in the Palestinians'
interests remains unclear. An improvement is clearly in Israel's interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment