G. Murphy Donovan January 12th
Muslim
sensitivities everywhere are now more important than truth or justice anywhere.
Alas, France and many other naïve Europeans have surrendered pride and identity
to Brussels and in turn volunteered to be colonized by a 5 column of
Arab/Muslim religious imperialists.
It’s hard to calculate the price of cheap labor when the real currency is
common sense, identity, or culture. The Arab no-go slums that surround Paris
are testimony to French venality, the blowback from communal Europe, and all
those associated social or economic fantasies.
With assimilation off the table, open borders become the open wounds of
cultural decay. Urban necrosis in Paris and London, and many other European
capitals, is a self-inflicted wound.
In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo slaughter, a British Sunni Imam in London
crowed on the Fox News Channel that the key to Muslim rage was sharia, that
arbitrary amalgam of contrived history, false prophets, and social toxins. Imam
Anjem Choudary’s suggestion to “submit” was nonetheless superfluous. European
and American journalists have been on their knees since oil was fifty cents a
gallon.
Starting with Daniel Pearl, and continuing with the recent spate of beheadings
by ISIS, we see video after video of journalists on their knees literally
pleading for their sorry apologetic lives, denouncing their homelands, and then
being butchered anyway. Journalists are a special obsession for Islam because
professional writers are now the iconic representatives of cowering
democracies. No group has done more to rationalize and sanitize the barbarity
that is Islamic imperialism You would think that Islamists would embrace their
Media co-conspirators in Europe and America -- “Arab Spring” propagandists and
Palestine pimps for example. Au contraire! For the devout, the apostate must be
put to the sword before the infidel.
Apologists
and traitors are reviled by both sides.
Fear is the dominant ethic of modern journalism; fear to mock Mohammed or the
Koran, fear to document the clear links between atrocity and religious dogma,
fear to publish the graphic evidence of beheadings, fear to expose slavery,
abuse of children, and rampant misogyny, fear to offend Arab dictators, fear to
offend ayatollahs and imams, and now the fear to publish the very satire that
precipitated the death of real heroes. American and European editors also fear
that things might get worse, a dread that now has all the earmarks of
inevitability.
An amateur video about prophetic pedophilia was used to justify the slaughter
in Benghazi and now provocative cartoons are used to justify the carnage in
Paris. “Piss Christ” is rationalized as high art in New York City but any
mockery of Mohammed’s yen for little girls is regarded as justifiable capital
blasphemy.
Yes, the Charlie Hebdo journalists were rare exceptions in a trade where
timidity is the norm and candor is a vice. Any offense, real or imagined, is
the real peril for modern journalists, the tar baby of political correctness.
Truth is now any pabulum that pacifies gutless editors and their clueless
readers.
The feigned indignation, mock shock, and hypocrisy of private and public media
outlets over the latest outrage is mind-boggling.
There’s nothing new or startling about the bloodbath in Paris or the carnage
that is sure to follow. Pander precedents are now legendary: the bloody trail
from Satanic Verses to Charlie Hebdo is now a well-travelled venue of liberal,
artistic, and literary shame.
The Associated Press, Washington Post, or New York Times are no more likely to
publish the evidence for which their French colleagues died then they are to
refuse to wear head scarfs in Dhār. The BBC, American PBS, and the Fox News
Channel are not likely to show on air any satiric cartoons about Islam either.
The Charlie Hebdo raid, like the 9/11 attack, is thus another win for the prophet’s
vanguard, another nail in the coffin of civility.
The West
is now impaled on the horns of the dot.com dilemma: on the one hand governments
and internet industries who exercise no restraint in collecting information;
and on the other hand analysis, public and private, which ignores or twists
facts for fear of offending the guilty.
Small wonder then, that the humiliation of democracies like France, England,
and America is now a blood sport for the Ummah. The official response in
America is prophylactic self-censorship. The Associated Press (AP) and the
Obama White House have revised the official and public rhetoric of politics to
eliminate words like Islamism -- as if there were no links between deviance and
devotion.
François Hollande, a metrosexual in the Chirac mold, called for a moment of
silence the day after the latest Muslim blitzkrieg. That moment of prayer in
Paris was no tribute to slain journalists or freedom of the press. Where
timidity is a value and courage a vacuum, “silence” is the perfect word to
capture European and American cowardice. Silence is the preferred response to
jihad, Islamism, and Islamo-fascism. Alas, silence is acceptance and silence is
submission. And ultimately, silence is the sickly sweet sound of surrender.
Europe is not “Charlie.” America is afraid too. Both are weak. Islamic
terrorists are victorious again.
