For full report see http://jcpa.org/hamas-threat-no-different-from-isis/
The outgoing
head of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Lieutenant General Michael
Flynn, asserted at the Aspen Security Forum in July 2014 that the fall of Hamas
in the Gaza Strip would probably lead to a worse alternative along the lines of
the Islamic State (ISIS), which has been established in large areas of Syria
and Iraq.
Flynn’s assessment is based on the implicit assumption that Hamas is more
ideologically moderate than ISIS and does not pose a severe threat to U.S.
allies in the Middle East or to the West in general.
Yet scrutiny of the stances taken by
Hamas, along with its modes of warfare in the current round of conflict reveals
the ideological and operational likeness between Hamas and ISIS.
From the start, Hamas directed its
massive and ongoing missile offensive at civilian targets, seeking to inflict
casualties as indiscriminately and on as large a scale as possible. Like ISIS,
Hamas has demonstrated that its terror policy knows no moral bounds.
Hamas
leader Khaled Mashal denied claims that Hamas’ missiles were intended to kill
Israeli civilians; in his view, all the Jews living in “Palestine” are
actually warriors rather than civilians. As Mashal said in a speech in Qatar on
July 23, “They accused us [Hamas] of attacking civilians [Jews] and of
continuing to attack civilians daily. Do not say that the settlers [the Jews]
are civilians. They [the Jews] live on occupied land, which is not legal for
them, they are armed, they kill and they cause destruction.
On July
25, Hamas’ official Al-Aqsa TV broadcast
the weekly Friday sermon from the mosque in Deir al-Balah in Gaza, in which the
imam called for the total annihilation of the Jews:
Our
doctrine in fighting you [the Jews] is that we will totally exterminate you. We
will not leave a single one of you alive, because you are alien usurpers of the
land and eternal mercenaries. You are the mercenaries of all times. Research
the history, my brothers. Wherever the Jews lived, they spread corruption.
Threats
to subject the Jews of “Palestine” to genocide also occur in statements by the
leaders of Hamas and of its military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades. For example, in an Al-Qassam Brigades
propaganda video in May, the Jews were warned to hurry up and leave “Palestine”
or their fate would be death.
Hamas’s
genocidal mindset is evident in its choice of targets for attack. At several
points Hamas has expressed pride in aiming long-range rockets at strategic
targets in Israel including the nuclear reactor in Dimona, the
chemical plants in Haifa, and Ben-Gurion Airport. Operating
under the authority and command of Hamas, the Islamic Jihad targeted Soreq
nuclear reactor south of Tel Aviv. These attempted strikes, if
successful, could have caused thousands and possibly tens of thousands of
casualties. Hamas hardly appears different from ISIS, which decrees a policy of
the genocide of infidels without any moral constraints.
Organizations ideologically associated
with ISIS, such as the “Islamic State in Beit al-Maqdis,” have also taken part
in the campaign against Israel. Hamas, while holding the reins in Gaza,
provides a comfortable haven to all the Palestinian terror organizations and
allows al Qaeda and ISIS groups to operate freely so long as they do not defy
its rule.
On the
ideological level, there is no difference between how Hamas and ISIS view the
West and the worldwide Islamic revolution. Hamas, too, calls for the founding
of the Islamic caliphate with its capital in Jerusalem. This is meant to be
part of the worldwide revolution whose ultimate objectives (in line with
Muhammad’s prophecy) are the liberation of Spain (Andalus) and Rome (capital of
the Vatican) and the implementation of global Islamic rule.
The
laws of Islam are being applied in Gaza, and Hamas members of parliament have
already prepared a proposal for a law that would revise the existing criminal
law to punish grave violations of Islamic law enabling executions including
crucifixions; the amputation of limbs for thieves; and flogging for drinkers of
alcohol.
Hamas and ISIS differ on only two
important issues: the alliance Hamas has forged with Shiite Iran, which has
outraged Egypt and Saudi Arabia who view Iran as a strategic threat, and
secondly, Hamas’ willingness to play the political and diplomatic game within
its ideological boundaries. Unlike ISIS, Hamas is prepared to cooperate with
human rights organizations in pursuit of its own objectives, particularly, at
this stage, constraining the IDF in attacking targets in Gaza, which would
grant Hamas a “license to kill” Israelis while hiding behind human shields.
In sum,
the threat Hamas poses to the West is not fundamentally different from the
threat posed by ISIS and its branches. Both organizations seek to overthrow the
pro-Western regimes in the Middle East, eject Western influence from the
region, and establish an Islamic caliphate to wage holy war (jihad) against the West and Christianity, which are
considered the cardinal enemies of Islam. The rise of radical Islam in the
Middle East, and the creation of the caliphate and other Islamic “emirates”
(official and de facto) along with the toppling of existing governments, could
gradually foster the conditions leading to a jihad front against Western
interests and allies.
No comments:
Post a Comment