I live here
in Israel and yet receive reports daily from all walks of life in the UK about
the changing attitudes towards Israel and Jews in that country.
Having
discussed this issue with the UK Ambassador and his staff at various meetings,
the usual canards are spouted that ”we are exaggerating”, the incidents are
carried out by fringe elements” and “basically everything is OK in the UK”. In
fact the Ambassador fails to understand why more Israelis are not prepared to
study in UK universities since “there really are no problems”!!
Just who is
he trying to kid??
The blog
below is yet another instance of how the herd mentality is inexorably gaining
momentum not just amongst the rabble rousers but also amongst the “chattering
classes” and the “upper crust” of UK society.
Bye-bye London
Caroline Glick January 21, 2013, 11:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
an interview with Haaretz in November 2010, British novelist Martin
Amis said the following about discussions of Israel in his motherland:
I live in a mildly anti-Semitic country,
and Europe is mildly anti-Semitic, and they hold Israel to a higher moral
standard than its neighbors. If you bring up Israel in a public meeting in
England, the whole atmosphere changes. The standard left-wing person never
feels more comfortable than when attacking Israel. Because they are the only
foreigners you can attack. Everyone else is protected by having dark skin, or
colonial history, or something. But you can attack Israel. And the atmosphere
becomes very unpleasant. It is traditional, snobbish, British anti-Semitism
combined with present-day circumstances.
After participating last week in a debate in
London about Israeli communities beyond the 1949 armistice lines organized by
the self-consciously pretentious Intelligence Squared debating
society, I can now say from personal experience that Amis is correct. The
public atmosphere in England regarding Israel is ugly and violent.
The resolution we debated read: "Israel
is destroying itself with its settlement policy. If settlement expansion
continues Israel will have no future."
My debating partner was Danny Dayan, the
outgoing head of the Yesha Council.
We debated Daniel Levy, one of the founders
of J-Street and the drafter of the Geneva Initiative, and the son of Lord
Michael Levy, one of Tony Blair's biggest fundraisers; and William Sieghart, a
British philanthropist who runs a non-profit that among other things, champions
Hamas. Levy has publicly stated that Israel's creation was
immoral. And Sieghart has a past record of saying that
Israel's delegitimization would be a salutary proces and calling for a complete
cultural boycott of Israel while laudingHamas.
We lost overwhelmingly. I think the final
vote tally was something like 500 for the resolution and 100 against it.
A couple of impressions I took away from the
experience: First, I can say without hesitation that I hope never to return to
Britain. I actually don't see any point. Jews are targeted by massive
anti-Semitism of both the social and physical varieties. Why would anyone
Jewish want to live there?
As to visiting as an Israeli, again, I just
don't see the point. The discourse is owned by anti-Israel voices. They don't
make arguments to spur thought, but to end it, by appealing to people's
passions.
For instance, in one particularly ugly
segment, Levy made the scurrilous accusation that Israel systematically steals
land from the Palestinians. Both Dayan and I demanded that he provide just one
example of his charge. And the audience raged against us for our temerity at
insisting that he provide substantiation for his baseless allegation. In the
event, he failed to substantiate his allegation.
At another point, I was asked how I defend
the Nazi state of Israel. When I responded by among other things giving the
Nazi pedigree of the Palestinian nationalist movement founded by Nazi agent Haj
Amin el Husseini and currently led by Holocaust denier Mahmoud Abbas, the crowd
angrily shouted me down.
I want to note that the audience was made up
of upper crust, wealthy British people, not unwashed rabble rousers. And yet
they behaved in many respects like a mob when presented with pro-Israel
positions.
I honestly don't know whether there are
policy implications that arise from my experience in London last week. I have
for a long time been of the opinion that Israel shouldn't bother to try to win
over Europe because the Europeans have multiple reasons for always being
anti-Israel and none of them have anything to do with anything that Israel
does. As I discuss in my book, these reasons include anti-Semitism,
anti-Americanism, addiction to Arab oil, and growing Muslim populations in
Europe.
I was prepared to conduct a civilized debate
based on facts and reasoned argumentation. I expected it to be a difficult
experience. I was not expecting to be greeted by a well-dressed mob. My
pessimism about Europeans' capacity to avail themselves to reasoned, fact-based
argumentation about Israel has only deepened from the experience.
One positive note, I had a breakfast
discussion last Wednesday morning with activists from the Zionist Federation of
Britain. The people I met are committed, warm, hardworking Zionists. I wish
them all the best, and mainly that means, that I hope that these wonderful
people and their families make aliyah.
While their work is worthwhile, there is no future for
Jews in England.
1 comment:
we must look at not the conflict but what causes conflict. sales of military machinery generally causes conflicts. Peace is not about land. everybody already knew that Britain hates anybody was not written to by British mandates. Britian is always the bully and has long vintage relations to the Saudi.
Post a Comment