( ⃰The act of obscuring
something to make it more difficult to understand)
Khaled
Abu Toameh Feb 22, 2016
This current
"intifada" is simply a further phase in a larger plan to destroy
Israel. When the plan began officially, with the establishment of the PLO in
1964, there were no "settlements" -- not until after the June 1967
War -- so what exactly were the Palestinians planning to "liberate"?
The
current conflict is not about "defending" any mosque from being
contaminated by the "filthy feet" of Jews: it is about seeing Israel
forced to its knees. Abbas and others seek to reap delicious political fruits
from this "intifada."
Here is
a novel idea: Kerry could put pressure on the Palestinian and Jordanian
leadership to cease anti-Israeli incitement and indoctrination. Now that would
be pressure well applied.
U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry is back in town. This time he is meeting with
Jordanian and Palestinian leaders about "ongoing security issues in the
region and continued tensions between Israel and the Palestinians."
For
those not involved in political newspeak, here is a translation:
"Ongoing
security issues" = the Islamic State terror group (ISIS).
"Tensions
between Israel and the Palestinians" = the ongoing wave of Palestinian
stabbing, car-ramming and shooting attacks that began in October 2015.
Kerry
comes back, but never calls a spade a spade. The "tensions" to which
he deceptively alludes are knifings and car-rammings. And what is the biggest
spade that Kerry avoids calling by its name? The new generation of Palestinians
brainwashed to believe that Israel can be defeated with knives and car-attacks.
This
"intifada" is simply a further phase in a larger plan to humiliate
and destroy Israel. This plan began officially, with the establishment of the
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), in May 1964. At that time there were
no "settlements" -- not until after the June 1967 War -- so what
exactly were the Palestinians planning to "liberate"?
The
plan continued in 1974, at the twelfth session of the Palestinian National
Council in Cairo, with the 10-point "Phased Plan". Article 2 called
for "armed struggle" (terrorism) to establish "an independent
combatant national authority" that is "liberated" from Israeli
rule.
Contrary
to Palestinian leaders' pap, the current conflict is not about
"defending" any mosque from being contaminated by the "filthy
feet" of Jews: it is about seeing Israel forced to its knees. Abbas and
others seek to reap delicious political fruits from this "intifada."
That is
why, in his meeting with Kerry, Abbas made it clear that he intends to pursue
unilateral moves to impose a solution on Israel, with the help of the
international community.
Abbas
also told Kerry that he intends to continue with his efforts to seek a UN
Security Council resolution condemning Israel over "settlement construction."
Never mind that on
Palestinian maps, all of Israel is regarded as one big "settlement."
Palestinian
Authority leaders, official television, schools and media outlets often display
maps showing Palestine stretching from the River Jordan to the Mediterranean
Sea. The maps do not show the existence of Israel.
But
back to Kerry. His "tensions" imply two sides engaged in some kind of
a dispute that has aggravated a situation and strained relations between them,
instead of what it really is: Palestinians openly trying to supplant Israelis
-- the entire state.
So the
game of obfuscation continues. No doubt, we will witness more pressure on
Israel to make concessions that will supposedly ease the "tensions."
Kerry
and his friends either do not "get it" or do not want to "get
it." Palestinians are waging an out-and-out war against Israel with the
goal of making Israelis suffer to a point at which they will beg their leaders
to capitulate. In the Palestinian view, such behavior pays off royally.
Im the
Palestinian mindset the two previous uprisings -- in 1987 and 2000 -- brought
major achievements to the Palestinians.
The
first "intifada" led to Israel's recognition of the PLO as the
"sole legitimate representative of the Palestinians" -- a move that
was followed by the signing of the Oslo Accords and the creation of the
Palestinian Authority.
The
second "intifada," the Palestinians argue, led to Israel's full
withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in the summer of 2005.
And so
we arrive at the newest wave of attacks. As the saying goes: Step-by-step.
Kerry
would like to see an end to the Palestinian attacks on Israeli Jews. The only
problem is that his vacuous rhetoric prevents him from having a snowball's
chance in a Middle Eastern summer from attaining that goal.
Let us
also not underestimate Palestinian Authority rejectionism. On the eve of the
Kerry-Abbas meeting, Palestinian Authority officials were quoted as saying that
they did not expect anything positive to come out of the talks "because
the U.S. remains biased in favor of Israel."
As
always, the Palestinian stance is, "MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY."
Moreover,
Kerry is dreaming if he thinks that President Mahmoud Abbas or King Abdullah
are able to stop the attacks on Israelis. Neither has the mandate or the credibility
to do so. In any case, they and their media outlets are too busy with their
anti-Israeli ranting to do much on that score.
Thus
far, not a word has been uttered by either of the two Arab leaders that could
be even vaguely interpreted by their people as "stop killing
Israelis." In the Palestinian Looking Glass, it is Israel that is
responsible for the deadly attacks. After all, claims that are untrue about
Israelis "storming and desecrating the Al-Aqsa Mosque and other Islamic
holy sites" are provocative, to say the least.
Here is
a novel idea: Kerry could put pressure on the Palestinian and Jordanian
leadership to cease anti-Israeli incitement and indoctrination. Now that would
be pressure well applied. And it does not even require funding.
When
Kerry and his crew finally wake up to the fact that it is precisely this
incitement that is driving Palestinians into the open arms of ISIS, Hamas and
other terror groups, perhaps, finally, we will be able to hope for "easing
tensions in the region."
Meanwhile,
Kerry is back blathering about peace in the Middle East. Unfortunately, he
seems incapable of calling a spade a spade -- especially when that spade's name
is Palestinian prevarication.
Khaled
Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.